您现在的位置是:綜合 >>正文
【】Hope you're taking notes.Credit: INtel
綜合4241人已围观
简介The auto industry believes self-driving cars are the future of transportation and could be a key fac ...
The auto industry believes self-driving cars are the future of transportation and could be a key factor in preventing accidents, but the public is wary of autonomous vehicles (AVs). So companies are looking to find new ways to convince consumers that driverless cars are a good idea.。
Now, Intel says it can actually demonstrate exactly how safe AVs can be — and believes it has the math to prove it.。
Amnon Shashua, who is the SVP of Intel's Autonomous Driving Group and CEO of recently acquired Mobileye, just published an academic paper that claims to provide a mathematical formula that can be applied to AVs to make sure that they won't cause accidents on the road. Intel and Mobileye also released a "layman's summary paper" on the formula, for those of us who never advanced beyond basic algebra. 。
SEE ALSO:The 'Google of China' is working on a driverless bus for next year and fully self-driving cars by 2021 。Shashua and his co-authors' solution describes a "Responsibility Sensitive Safety" model, which Intel believes can be used to create autonomous vehicles that will never be responsible for a car accident. The model describes scenarios in which AVs will use pre-programmed systems to behave safely, like a "Safe Distance Formula" to handle highway driving.。

Thanks for signing up! 。 Importantly, the model isn't designed to eliminate 。all。
accidents — the framers acknowledge that there will be human drivers on the road with driverless cars for "decades," and people will still make mistakes and crash their cars. We've already seen human-AV accidents during Google's (now Waymo) and Uber's on-road trials.。
The point of the formula, then, is to take away any question of liability from the autonomous systems during those incidents, which is a far cry from eliminating crashes entirely. Intel believes that AVs operating with a Responsibility Sensitive Safety model will be essentially blameless, which is probably not the first thing you want to tell someone after a fender bender.。Hope you're taking notes.Credit: INtel 。
Unfortunately, this appears to be the type of reasoning that makes the public nervous about AVs in the first place. People are skeptical about the decision-making process behind AI systems in general, but particularly when it comes to self-driving cars.。
The new Responsibility Sensitive Safety model could make AVs the most accident averse vehicles on the road, but for many, the only way they'd feel comfortable letting a robot take the wheel would be if they're guaranteed to have an absolute zero chance of a crash. Until humans stop driving, that's impossible — so maybe Intel should stick to trying to win the public over to driverless cars with LeBron James instead of math. 。
Featured Video For You 。
Featured Video For You。
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://www.new.maomao321.com/news/71b4099888.html
相关文章
17 questions you can answer if you're a good communicator
綜合Whether you regularly speak in public and write online, or you mostly express yourself over email, b ...
【綜合】
阅读更多誰在等你你在等著誰是什麽歌
綜合前言 :答:歌名 :《誰》演唱:小柯作詞:小柯作曲:小柯歌詞:遇見你的我,碰到我的你在同樣的深夜裏,寫了同樣的日記望著你的我,望著我的你在同樣的時光裏,問著同樣的問題誰在等你 ,你在等著誰誰在等我,我在等著 ...
【綜合】
阅读更多隻有冬夏再無春秋什麽梗
綜合一年之計在於冬是什麽梗?上。所謂“一年之計在於冬,一天之計在於晚”,是說我們奧康做任何事情都要未雨綢繆,做好充足的提前量,如果別人提前一周準備好,我們一定是提前兩周甚至一個月...冬馬小三什麽梗問題一 ...
【綜合】
阅读更多
