您现在的位置是:百科 >>正文
【】Tweet may have been deleted
百科82841人已围观
简介It seems like it's getting harder these days to hide the fact that you're surreptitiously monitoring ...
It seems like it's getting harder these days to hide the fact that you're surreptitiously monitoring left-wing political activists. And accidentally tweeting proof of that fact sure doesn't make it any easier. 。
Massachusetts state police are dealing with that reality this week after a Twitter slip-up revealed that they were keeping tabs on a number of political groups in the area. And, surprise, it was anti-Trump and anti police-brutality groups that are under the cops' watchful eyes. 。
SEE ALSO:Twitter bug could make it appear you liked Donald Trump's tweets。SEE ALSO:Twitter bug could make it appear you liked Donald Trump's tweets。 Helpfully,The Guardian。
recaps what went down. While tweeting a warning to residents potentially affected by the tragic gas explosions rocking the Boston suburbs this past week, the state police included a photo of a map of other areas that might require evacuation. 。

“Reminder: all residents of Lawrence/Andover/N[orth] Andover who have Columbia Gas must evacuate, as should anyone else who smells gas,” read the now-deleted tweet.。
But it's the photo, helpfully saved before the police realized their mistake, that tells the larger story.。
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.。
Thanks for signing up! 。
Tweet may have been deleted。
Among those include bookmarks to the pages of the Coalition to Organize and Mobilize Boston Against Trump (COMBAT), Mass Action Against Police Brutality, Facebook MA Activism, and a progressive-curated calendar of anti-Trump rallies. 。
The police are literally keeping tabs on peaceful left-wing activist groups.。
The police are literally keeping tabs on peaceful left-wing activist groups.。
Yeah, oops.。
But to hear David Procopio, the state police director of media communications, tell it, this is not at all what it looks like. 。
"We do not collect information about – nor, frankly, do we care about – any group’s beliefs or opinions,” he told the Guardian. 。
Which is totally believable. After all, who are you going to believe?
Which is totally believable. After all, who are you going to believe? Paid police spokesperson Procopio, or your lying eyes?
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://www.new.maomao321.com/news/566c3099403.html
相关文章
Fake news reports from the Newseum are infinitely better than actual news
百科Actual investigative journalism: who needs it?At least, that's what some people will likely conclude ...
【百科】
阅读更多阿森納官宣威洛克永久加盟紐卡 曝轉會費2500萬鎊
百科阿森納官宣威洛克永久加盟紐卡 曝轉會費2500萬鎊_賽季www.ty42.com 日期:2021-08-14 01:31:00| 評論(已有296399條評論) ...
【百科】
阅读更多武磊曬球迷現場觀賽視頻:足球本該有的樣子 回來了
百科武磊曬球迷現場觀賽視頻:足球本該有的樣子 回來了_比賽www.ty42.com 日期:2021-08-15 18:01:00| 評論(已有296757條評論) ...
【百科】
阅读更多
