您现在的位置是:休閑 >>正文
【】
休閑98717人已围观
简介Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016. An old one is making the round ...
Apparently Facebook hoaxes are still alive and well in the year 2016.
An old one is making the rounds this week, and everyone really needs to stop freaking out. The hoax tells Facebook users to repost a paragraphs-long status to to ensure their privacy.
The two statuses, per CBS News:
As of September 28th , 2015 at 10:50p.m. Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute).
NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates.
And:
Now it's official! It has been published in the media. Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to "private." If you paste this message on your page, it will be offered free (I said paste not share) if not tomorrow, all your posts can become public. Even the messages that have been deleted or the photos not allowed. After all, it does not cost anything for a simple copy and paste.
In case you still had questions, no, reposting either of these statuses will not protect you from any Facebook encroachment on your privacy.
According to Snopes, the hoaxes go back to at least 2012. The claim behind the statuses isn't true, Snopessaid, since Facebook does not claim copyright to personal information and has not indicated any plans to make private accounts public.
In any case, posting a status would not counteract the legal agreement every Facebook user must check before signing up for an account.
This time around, people are noticing the statuses and posting to warn others of the hoaxes more quickly than in years past. (Not that that's particularly useful either.)
Maybe endorse a candidate for president instead.
TopicsCybersecurityFacebookPrivacy
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://www.new.maomao321.com/news/55c7599869.html
相关文章
Sound the alarms: Simone Biles finally met Zac Efron
休閑Is there anything Simone Biles can't do?The unstoppable gymnast just won her fifth medal of the Rio ...
【休閑】
阅读更多Here's the deal with those weird Amazon ambassador Twitter amounts
休閑From failed attempts at sassy clapbacks to high-tech trolling, it's been a weird week for Amazon on ...
【休閑】
阅读更多DIYers, save up to 20% on spring essentials at The Home Depot
休閑The following content is brought to you by Mashable partners. If you buy a product featured here, we ...
【休閑】
阅读更多
热门文章
- Make money or go to Stanford? Katie Ledecky is left with an unfair choice.
- Gender bias online is as harmful as ever. Here are a few ways to fight back.
- Every 'Into the Dark' horror movie on Hulu ranked
- The pandemic pushed us deeper into the internet rabbit hole, and most of us can't keep track
- Honda's all
- Perseverance's first Mars focus is a rock named using Navajo language
最新文章
Donald Trump's tangled web of Russian influence
Marvel's 'The Falcon and the Winter Soldier' composer interview
Why 1619 is an important year in U.S. history
How to see a map of all the photos you take on your iPhone
Satisfy your Olympics withdrawals with Nike's latest app
Climate change is making Kyoto's cherry blossoms bloom the earliest in 1,200 years