您现在的位置是:探索 >>正文
【】
探索75人已围观
简介Alexa Answers is somehow turning out even worse than expected. The program, launched in September, g ...
Alexa Answers is somehow turning out even worse than expected.
The program, launched in September, gives any idiot off the streets of the U.S. the chance to answer real questions posed to Amazon's Alexa smart assistant by actual people. As any thinking internet user might have expected, just over a month into the service those answers range from unintentionally inaccurate, to deliberate trolling, to calculated misinformation.
According to Amazon, here's how Alexa Answers is supposed to work: "Discover questions Alexa doesn't have an answer for, submit your own and share them with the world."
And by share them, Amazon means you'll have your answer actually read aloud to real people by their smart assistant.
In exchange for this decidedly unpaid labor, contributors are rewarded with "points." It's perhaps unsurprising, then, that the old aphorism "you get what you pay for" applies.
Credit: Screenshot / alexa AnswersTake one question and answer combo, viewable at the time of this writing on the Alexa Answers "community answers" page.
"What are mold pigs," reads the question posed by some Alexa user, somewhere. The correct answer, at least according to an Oct. 9 CNN story, is "a new family, genus and species of microinvertebrates that lived during the mid-Tertiary period."
The Alexa Answers answer, "currently being shared with Alexa customers," reads quite differently.
"Mold pigs are overweight animals, usually with green or purple hair and an unpleasant demeanor. Their usual habitat is west-coast university campuses."
Uh, no.Credit: screenshot / alexa answersThis, obviously, is someone trolling Alexa users. All in all, it's relatively harmless — even if it is wrong. However, according to a deep dive by VentureBeat, this is just the tip of the rapidly melting iceberg.
One example surfaced by the publication especially stands out. The question, "why are cows bad for the environment," was put to Alexa Answers users. While there are numerous, nuanced ways to answer this question, Alexa Answers takes a different approach.
"Cows are no more harmful for the environment than any other animal," reads one Alexa Answers response. "The 'cow farts' theory is a made-up theory by climate change radicals."
"Currently being shared with Alexa customers."Credit: screenshot / amazonIn case you're actually curious, the World Resources Institute has a detailed explanation of how beef production and consumption contributes to climate change. It does not involve the phrase "made-up theory."
SEE ALSO:Now any idiot off the street can answer your dumb Alexa questionsVentureBeat also discovered at least one instance of what appears to be product placement masquerading as a helpful answer. Likely, that is not an isolated instance.
That a for-profit corporation's attempt to crowdsource free labor backfired shouldn't come as a surprise to any thinking person. Why Amazon thought any of this would work out well, on the other hand, is a different question — one that even a trolling Alexa Answers user could have likely answered with a hearty "no way in hell."
TopicsAlexaAmazon
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://www.new.maomao321.com/news/54d52799418.html
相关文章
Visualizing July's astounding global temperature records
探索July set a rare temperature record during a year that is featuring off the charts warmth. The month ...
【探索】
阅读更多範加爾安排隊員扮演梅西;英超球員本屆世界杯進球最多(梅西世界杯進了幾球)
探索範加爾安排隊員扮演梅西;英超球員本屆世界杯進球最多梅西世界杯進了幾球)_世界杯 ( 世界杯,球員 )www.ty42.com 日期:2022-12-20 00:00:00| 評論(已有357486條 ...
【探索】
阅读更多【波盈足球】 影日本國腳三苫薫超華麗突破連甩4人 成功擊敗英格蘭門神 ( 後衛,英超 )
探索【波盈足球】 影日本國腳三苫薫超華麗突破連甩4人 成功擊敗英格蘭門神 ( 後衛,英超 )www.ty42.com 日期:2023-01-04 00:00:00| 評論(已有357583條評論) ...
【探索】
阅读更多