您现在的位置是:焦點 >>正文
【】
焦點494人已围观
简介The imminent WeChat ban that was set to remove the app from U.S. app stores on Sunday is going to ha ...
The imminent WeChat ban that was set to remove the app from U.S. app stores on Sunday is going to have to wait a bit longer. It's a big positive step for an app that has more than a billion users worldwide.
In a Sunday ruling, a U.S. judge in California put the brakes on Donald Trump's executive order from August calling for a WeChat ban (h/t CNBC). The court decision grew out of a lawsuit filed by the U.S. WeChat Users Alliance, following a Friday hearing.
"This is nothing else than a ban," Alliance attorney Michael Bien said in court on Friday, according to the Wall Street Journal. "What matters is our clients' rights to use the app will end on Sunday," he added, referring the the Sept. 20 date for the ban as laid out in Trump's order.
The executive actions were motivated by what Trump described as a national security risk, with Chinese companies – specifically WeChat and TikTok, in this case – potentially having access to American citizens' user data. The order called for control of the data to be handed over to U.S. interests, and that seems to be happening in the case of TikTok.
In the California WeChat case, the federal government maintained that a WeChat ban didn't represent an infringement on the plaintiffs' constitutional rights because there are other apps that provide similar features. But Judge Laurel Beeler, who is presiding over the case, wasn't sold.
SEE ALSO:Trump officially signs an executive order to ban TikTok and WeChat"[T]he court grants the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction on the ground that the plaintiffs have shown serious questions going to the merits of the First Amendment claim, the balance of hardships tips in the plaintiffs' favor, and the plaintiffs establish sufficiently the other elements for preliminary-injunctive relief," the court order reads.
The injunction also blocks a U.S. Commerce Department order that would have prevented U.S. interests from doing business with WeChat. Such a move could have undermined the platform's performance and functioned as a sort of de facto ban.
Neither Trump nor the Commerce Department had commented on Beeler's decision at the time of this writing. But this is a preliminary injunction meant to avoid unnecessary disruptions while the lawsuit unfolds, so the legal struggle is far from over.
TopicsSocial MediaDonald TrumpPolitics
Tags:
转载:欢迎各位朋友分享到网络,但转载请说明文章出处“夫榮妻貴網”。http://www.new.maomao321.com/news/1b51299486.html
相关文章
How Hyperloop One went off the rails
焦點In December 2014, an engineer with the unlikely name Brogan BamBrogan was in the driveway of his cla ...
【焦點】
阅读更多Lewdle is the all
焦點Wordle fans, cast your square-addled minds back to sometime last week when the Wordle of the day was ...
【焦點】
阅读更多TikTok loves 'We Don't Talk About Bruno' as much as you do
焦點In case you’ve been living under a rock, the Disney animated film Encantohas been all over Tik ...
【焦點】
阅读更多
热门文章
- Early Apple
- Everyone could have won 'Squid Game' hopscotch, and that's just bad game design
- James Webb telescope successfully launches into space
- Elon Musk to test Doge purchases for Tesla merch
- You will love/hate Cards Against Humanity's new fortune cookies
- Scientists declared these animals extinct in 2021
最新文章
Tyler, the Creator helped Frank Ocean celebrate 'Blonde' release in a delicious way
Alfa Romeo's Tonale hybrid SUV comes with an NFT
NASA's deep space satellite captures the shadow of an eclipse on Earth
Instagram will now show suspected hate speech lower in your Feed
Richard Branson 'thought he was going to die' in bike accident
Opera's new 'crypto browser' makes collecting NFTs shockingly easy